HomeKnowledge base › ISO 27001 and destruction
Standards

ISO 27001 and physical destruction: which controls require what?

Anyone seeking or maintaining ISO 27001 certification will sooner or later face the question of how confidential information is removed at end of life. The standard explicitly requires control of media disposal as part of the Information Security Management System (ISMS). This article unpacks the relevant controls from Annex A and shows what an auditor wants to see in practice.

Which controls touch destruction?

ISO 27001:2022 Annex A explicitly mentions, under ‘A.7 Physical controls’ and ‘A.8 Technological controls’:

Under the old version of the standard (ISO 27001:2013) this was spread across A.8.3 (Media handling) and A.11.2.7 (Secure disposal or re-use of equipment). The substance is materially the same. The structure was streamlined in 2022.

What does an auditor expect in practice?

Documentation

Evidence of execution

Operational controls

Information Classification: linking to destruction method

A common Annex A-conformant classification looks like this:

ClassExampleDestruction method
PublicPromotional materialRegular waste stream
InternalInternal proceduresDIN P-3
ConfidentialCustomer administration, HRDIN P-4 / P-5
Strictly ConfidentialSpecial categories of personal data, confidentiality-professional dataDIN P-5 / P-6, for hardware H-5 / H-6
The auditor wants to see classification and destruction method logically linked. Generic ‘everything at P-5’ works, but over-specifying is expensive and illogical.

NIST 800-88 as a technical source

ISO 27001 does not refer explicitly to NIST 800-88, but the standard is the implicit technical reference. In audit reports NIST's Clear / Purge / Destroy is often used as a technical class alongside DIN classifications. Read our article NIST 800-88 vs DIN 66399 for the translation table.

The supplier assessment

ISO 27001 certification requires periodic demonstration that external suppliers meet your security requirements. For a destruction supplier you ask, among other things:

Mobile versus off-site in ISO context

Auditors often ask about chain of custody. Mobile destruction (on site) shortens that chain considerably and is therefore often the recommended route in ISO context. For the wider trade-off, read mobile versus off-site shredding. For off-site, additional documentation is needed on transport security and processing time at the shredding site.

Common audit findings (NCs)

  1. ‘Disposal policy missing or outdated.’ Create and review annually.
  2. ‘No processor agreement with destruction supplier.’ Request it from the supplier.
  3. ‘Certificates incomplete (no DIN classification).’ Request a more explicit certificate.
  4. ‘No link between classification and disposal method.’ Include a table in the policy.
  5. ‘No supplier assessment.’ Plan annually or per job.

Our role in your ISO journey

We deliver as standard:

For IT MSPs managing ISO environments for clients this matters. Read our sector-specific article.

ISO 27001-compliant destruction evidence.

We deliver the processor agreement, certificate and on request a supplier statement. Ready to add directly to your ISO file.

Request a quote

Working on ISO certification? Email us via desnipperaar.nl about the specific audit evidence your auditor expects.